It has been nearly 20 years since the world was introduced to statutory adjudication through the pithily titled Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and save for minor tinkering around the edges it has not changed. In this article, we look at whether adjudication is still fit for purpose and the alternatives to adjudication, […]
Construction know how
The Supreme Court recently handed down judgment in the matter of Gard Marine and Energy Limited v China National Chartering Company Limited  UKSC 35 and ruled, by a majority of 3:2, that a contractual requirement to maintain joint insurance includes an implied term which precludes any claim by owners against the demise charterer, or […]
In an interesting decision in the Technology and Construction Court in March 2017, the Judge (Mrs Justice Jefford) considered a challenge by an unsuccessful party in an ICC arbitration. The Dispute The dispute arose from a contract to construct a power station in Kabul, Afghanistan. The Prime Contractor and the Respondent in the arbitration, Symbion […]
In Octoesse LLP v Trak Special Projects Limited  EWCH 3180, the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decided that the costs of claims consultants assisting in adjudication enforcement proceedings can be recovered as disbursements, assuming that those consultants acted in the adjudication. Facts Following a successful adjudication in favour of Trak Special Projects Limited (“Trak”), […]
Pre-Action Protocols, tailored for specific types of dispute, have been a feature of the litigation landscape for many years. They represent good practice and compliance is mandatory. A party runs the risk of costs sanctions if it fails to observe an applicable Protocol. One of the main objectives of Protocols is to encourage an early resolution […]
Recent developments in the construction insurance market: additional protections for consultants, contractors and third parties?
There is a new dawn for construction insurance following introduction of two Acts of Parliament in August 2016. With the introduction of the Insurance Act 2015 (“IA 2015”) and Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (“TPRAIA 2010”), English insurance law has undergone the most significant development since the inaugural Marine Insurance Act 1906 (“MIA […]
It is just over 3 weeks since the UK voted for BREXIT and matters have been moving quickly, at least in the world of politics. This article is written as part of a collection of articles in the GD Online special edition on BREXIT and examines the key issues in construction in the UK and […]
The right to adjudicate a dispute under a construction contract at any time is a powerful tool. Understandably, parties are reluctant to pursue a claim if the only viable route to do so is to commit to the time and costs of Court or arbitration proceedings. A decision to commence a construction adjudication (under statutory […]
The recent Technology and Construction Court decision in J Murphy & Sons Ltd -v- Beckton Energy Ltd  EWHC 607 (TCC) provides a useful illustration of the approach to Employer’s claims under the FIDIC Conditions under English law. The judgment will be of particular interest to users of the FIDIC suite who adopt English law […]
The construction industry is regarded as one of the most conflict and dispute ridden industries, which has resulted in it being one of the most claim orientated sectors. Traditionally, parties would enter into litigation, often a costly and long winded means of resolving a dispute. Over the years, various methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) […]
By its nature, adjudication is a rapid process. However, the need to run multiple adjudications in tandem often arises. The recent case of Deluxe Art & Theme Limited v. Beck Interiors Limited  EWHC 238 (TCC) has clarified whether, in the context of adjudications under the Scheme for Construction Contracts, the same adjudicator may simultaneously […]
Goodman Derrick’s construction group has successfully acted for a party in an enforcement action in the Technology and Construction Court. This was the first time the Court has had to grapple with the jurisdiction of an adjudicator to decide upon another adjudicator’s jurisdiction, as set out in the Notice of Adjudication. Penten Group Ltd v […]
Last month the Judge in charge of the Technology and Construction Court handed down Judgment in Persimmon Homes Ltd & others v Ove Arup & Partners Ltd & another  EWHC 3573 (TCC). The Judgment concerned in part the interpretation to be given to limitation and exclusion of liability provisions within Arup appointments/warranties. It is […]
Earlier this month the Supreme Court gave judgment in two combined cases concerning the law relating to contractual penalty clauses. In Cavendish Square Holdings BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis  UKSC 67, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to review the law on penalties for the first time since the […]
A recent decision of the Technology and Construction Court has highlighted the increased latitude an adjudicator enjoys, now that oral contracts are within the statutory adjudication framework. In order for the adjudication provisions in Part II of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (“the Act”) to apply to a contract, the agreement in […]
Many of you who are involved in the construction industry and property development will have heard the word ‘adjudication’, some of you may even have been unlucky enough to have actually been involved in an adjudication. In this article we seek to outline the basic principles and process of adjudication and explain what to expect. […]
The Technology & Construction Court (in the County Court sitting in Birmingham) has clarified the purpose of a counter-notice issued under section 4 of the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (“the Act”), and considered the scope of the statutory duty imposed by the Act. Background In Bridgland –v- Earlsmead Estates Limited  EWHC B8 (TCC), […]
International construction projects frequently use an industry form known as the FIDIC Conditions of Contract. Although the contracts vary, the differences are not significant for the purposes of this article. The FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction (where the design is undertaken by or on behalf of the Employer) are known as the “Red Book”. […]
The government’s aim in introducing the Act is to enable small businesses to innovate, grow and compete. The hope is also that internationally it will endorse the UK as a trusted and fair place to do business. The Act received Royal Assent on 26 March 2015 and is set to have a significant impact on […]
In the recent case of Cockell v Holton (No 2)  EWHC 1117 (TCC), which was a claim arising out of works to a listed building following a fire, the Judge refused to grant the Defendant permission to pursue a significant Counterclaim, but allowed him to amend his Defence to include the allegations contained in […]
The recent case of Khurana v. Webster Construction Limited  EWHC 758 (TCC) highlights the need for care when agreeing to be “bound” by an adjudicator’s award. Adjudication is widely used in the construction industry to resolve disputes. It has various advantages over court proceedings, in particular speed and cost. One potential disadvantage is that […]
Where a project is governed by a JCT form of contract, the Final Certificate is intended to ensure that disputes arising after practical completion are resolved with a degree of finality and speed. The usual provision is that a party has 28 days in which to challenge the Final Certificate, once it has been issued. […]
***** Stop Press: Katee Dias was recognised as a “Star Legal Writer” by the The Lawyer for this article. ***** Katee Dias Employment Lawyer Goodman Derrick Top Five HR Resolutions As January is often seen as the time for instigating change, we thought it would be helpful to consider some possible New Year resolutions for those of […]
Goodman Derrick’s Construction Partners Attend the Inaugural Conference of The Peruvian Society of Construction Law
The Peruvian Society of Construction Law (“SCL”) held its inaugural conference at the Universidad Del Pacifico in Lima on 9th and 10th April 2014. The SCL has not been long constituted in Peru and so it was gratifying that some 300 delegates attended the Conference. Goodman Derrick partners John Wright and Richard Bailey attended; Richard is the current Chairman of SCL UK and Vice President of the European Society of Construction Law.
Adjudication is a well established method of resolving disputes in the construction field in the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore. Malaysia have followed this lead by passing the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”). CIPAA is now in force and John Wright’s briefing is available by clicking here. John is a Construction Partner at Goodman Derrick with specialist knowledge and experience of international construction arbitration.
Since 2012, the Government has been conducting an audit of EU powers (or “competences” to use the jargon) with a view to seeking whether their repatriation to the UK in appropriate cases. In a recent consultation, it has got round to asking interested parties on about the current division of regulatory responsibilities between Brussels and […]
Subterranean excavations may be an increasingly popular method of extending a property, but such developments also carry potential pitfalls. Planning controls do not usually apply to a development that does not affect the external appearance of a property, but means of redress still exist for neighbours who are adversely affected by basement excavation works, whether […]
As with 2013, there will be no rest for employment law advisers, employers and HR practitioners in 2014, with further legislative change on the agenda. Many of the changes hail from the government’s Red Tape Challenge following its publication of the report “Progress on Reform” on 14 March 2013, which detailed the intended timetable for […]
In 2011, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN, the professional body for domain name registration) launched the new generic top level domain (gTLD) programme to permit the introduction of new top level domains on the internet. The move, which has attracted much publicity, will allow web addresses to end in a whole range of new domains (such as .app, .sport, .accountant) beyond the likes of .com, .co.uk and .net.
New rules on costs management are intended to benefit litigants by ensuring that the legal costs of fighting a case are proportionate to the issues in dispute. On the face of it this sounds like it must be a positive step, however the reality is that the changes may not be as beneficial as would initially appear to be the case.
Agency Workers – Tribunal Decides “Swedish Derogation” Lawful for Maintaining Pay Difference between Permanent and Agency Workers
An Employment Tribunal has decided that a temporary work agency which transferred a group of agency workers off zero hours contracts onto guaranteed hours contracts did in fact comply with the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 and that the Swedish Derogation could be relied upon [Bray and others v Monarch Personnel Refuelling (UK) Ltd ET/1801581/12 and others].
1st April sees the introduction of a new structure for the regulation of financial services in the UK. Is its rolling out on April Fools’ Day just a bit of quirky Britishness or a true indication that we would be fooling ourselves in thinking that a mere re-organisation could prevent a repeat of the banking and financial crisis?
At the end of last month the Government announced a number of changes to permitted development rights, including allowing the change of use from offices (Class B1(a)) to residential (Class C3) without the need for planning permission. The intention of the new scheme is to make best use of existing developed sites and facilitate speedier conversion of redundant office space into desirable residential accommodation.
In a recent case, the Court considered the issue of whether covenants in a share purchase agreement amounted to penalties and whether restrictions were an unreasonable restraint of trade.
In Shakespeare’s time, lawyers adopted a “no fee, no breath” approach. In spite of the still widely held view that lawyers will do anything for money and nothing without it, “no win, no fee” arrangements have become commonplace in recent years in English litigation. However, a series of controversial changes are shortly to be introduced which, depending on one’s viewpoint, may reduce access to justice for some, whilst increasing it for others and place some losing parties in a fairer position, but some in a worse one. Jonathan Haydn-Williams explains the current position and the imminent changes.